SEARCH...:


recently watched....:
  • Neomura [en]
  • Main Page [ar]
  • SD [ksh]
  • 1639 [jv]
  • イギリスの鉄道 [ja]
  • Catègorie:Tch·ad [frp]
  • AU [fr]
  • Natural [en]
  • 1313 [gl]
  • 607 [ksh]
  • Category:火山災害の歴史 [ja]

  • jetzt mitverdienen


    Der freche Erotikshop!
    02 Logo 120x60

    Party Explosion - Click here!
    Final Fantasy III DS game

    Miller Brothers, Click here!
    www.easycar.com
    Estate
    Win a Supercar of your dreams........make Summer special this year

    00003 ORION - Logo
    Fancy a hot adventure? More fun for HIM and HER – Shopping at PABO.com!

    LANGUAGE: ar | id | bg | ca | ceb | cs | da | de | et | en / / | es | eo | fr | gr | he | hr it | ko | lt | hu | nl | ja | no | pl | pt | ru | ro | sk | sl | sr | fi | sv | te | tr | uk | zh

    Neomura

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Jump to: navigation, search
    Neomura
    Fossil range: Paleoarchean - Recent[1]
    Hirudo medicinalis, a leech
    Scientific classification
    Superdomain: Neomura
    Domains
    Domain Archaea
    Domain Eukaryota

    Neomura is a speculative clade composed of the two domains of life of Archaea and Eukarya. The group was first proposed by Thomas Cavalier-Smith and its name means "new walls"; so called because it is thought to have evolved from Bacteria, and one of the major changes was the replacement of peptidoglycan cell walls with other glycoproteins. The adjectival form is Neomuran, and a single individual from the group is called a Neomuran.

    LUA  

    Chlorobacteria




    Hadobacteria




    Cyanobacteria




    Gracilicutes




    Eurybacteria




    Endobacteria




    Actinobacteria


     Neomura 

    Archaea



    Eukarya











    [edit] Morphology

    The Neomura are a very diverse group, containing all of the multicellular species, as well as all of the most extremophilic species. But they all share certain molecular characteristics. All Neomurans have histones to help with chromosome packaging, and most have introns. All use the molecule methionine as the initiator amino acid for protein synthesis (Bacteria use formylmethionine). Finally, all Neomurans use several kinds of RNA polymerase, whereas Bacteria use only one.

    [edit] History

    When Carl Woese first published his three-domain system, it was believed that the domains Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya were equally old and equally related on the tree of life. However certain evidence began to suggest that Eukarya and Archaea were more closely related to each other than either was to Bacteria. This evidence included the common use of cholesterols and proteasomes, which are complex molecules not found in most bacteria. So, it was thought that there were two branches of life: Bacteria, and Neomura.

    A phylogenetic tree, showing how Eukaryota and Archaea are more closely related to each other than to Bacteria, based on Cavalier-Smith's theory of bacterial evolution.

    But recently, Cavalier-Smith showed evidence that Neomura evolved from Bacteria. The strongest evidence is that all known eukaryotes have mitochondria, which almost certainly evolved through endosymbiosis with an alpha-proteobacteria (a highly evolved group of bacteria). If Eukarya is as old as Bacteria, it almost certainly would have branched during the many millions of years it took for Bacteria to evolve the aerobic respiration performed by mitochondria, and some eukaryotes would have evolved without mitochondria.

    A smaller but important piece of evidence is that the cholesterols and proteasomes found in Neomura are also found in Actinobacteria, perhaps the most highly evolved Bacteria. Molecules of this complexity are unlikely to evolve more than once in separate branches, so either there was a horizontal transfer of those two pathways, or Neomura evolved from this particular branch of the bacterial tree. This theory of Neomuran evolution is shown in the image to the right.

    [edit] References

    1. Thomas Cavalier-Smith, The origin of eukaryote and archaebacterial cells, Ann NY Acad Sci 503: 17–54 (1987)
    2. Thomas Cavalier-Smith, The neomuran origin of archaebacteria, the negibacterial root of the universal tree and bacterial megaclassification, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 52: 7–76 (2002)
    3. Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses. Biol Direct. 2006; 1: 19. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-1-19.
    4. Skophammer RG, Servin JA, Herbold CW, Lake JA. Evidence for a gram-positive, eubacterial root of the tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1761-8.
    Change language: All | الرربية | Bahasa Indonesia | Български | Català | Cebuano | Ħesky | Dansk | Deutsch | Eesti | English | Español | Esperanto | Français | עברית | Hrvatski | Italiano | 핶국어 | Lietuvių | Magyar | Nederlands | 旡涬語 | Norsk (bokmál) | Polski | Português | Русскиб | Română | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Suomi | Svenska | తెలుగు | Türkçe | УкраїнсѦка | 中文

    Autorem skryptu AdWiki v0.8 (2007) jest husky83
    Wikipedia jest zarejestrowanym znakiem towarowym Wikimedia Foundation
    Wszystkie materiały pochodzą z Wikipedii, obięte są licencją GNU Free Documentation License