User:Rjd0060

This page has a backlog that requires the attention of experienced editors. Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared.

Bot-reported

• 74.64.71.167 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log • Abuse Report) - Retard-O-Bot was changed by 74.64.71.167 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-08T06:52:11+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• 122.106.178.210 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log • Abuse Report) - Davidson High School (New South Wales) was changed by 122.106.178.210 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-08T07:16:56+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot (talk) 07:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

User-reported

• Gnomesaregood (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) - On Ysabella Brave; vandalism after final warning. Constantly adding POV statements to the above article and accusing editors (particularly me) of persecution and hidden agendas. He/she is also constantly attacking me... RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 06:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• Kustard100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) - actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Using account only to insert nonsensical and unsourced joke edits involving actor Burt Kwouk.. Redfarmer (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• 203.131.132.227 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log • Abuse Report) – vandalism, including 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5 – --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• 122.106.178.210 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log • Abuse Report) - vandalism after recent release of block --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 07:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• Shielld (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) - On Arzun es gay (diff); vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account E Wing (talk) 07:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• 70.116.75.24 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log • Abuse Report) - On Tommie Harris (diff); vandalism after final warning Pumeleon^T 07:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Bot-reported

• More than twenty letters maybe more than forty (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the regular expression called 40chars. The portion that matched was More than twenty letters maybe more than.

• This report was delayed until the user edited.
• The string called 40chars has a comment associated with it: Username exceeds 40 characters. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Discussing with user. in non-templated fashion. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• Ophelia's Revenge (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• Matches the literal pattern revenge.

• The string revenge is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Wait until the user edits. I don't see this as a problem. TN‑X-Man 18:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• Mfelch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• Matches the literal pattern felch. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Wait until the user edits. Just to be on the safe side. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

• MyStupidAccount (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the literal pattern stupid.

• This report was delayed until the user edited. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Not a blatant violation. I don't see a problem with this, particularly since the user is editing constructively. Daniel Case (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• Moontrolll (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the literal pattern troll.

• This report was delayed until the user edited.
• The string troll is prone to false positives, please take extra care ensuring this name is actually a violation before blocking.
• The string troll has a comment associated with it: The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 03:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Not a blatant violation. Edits seem to be good-faith. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• Publicbroadcasting (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the regular expression called Promotional? 2. The portion that matched was Public.

• This report was delayed until the user edited.
• The string called Promotional? 2 has a comment associated with it: Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: Edits were to deleted article but did not implicate name. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• Yahoodotcom123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock)

• This user has edited at least one time.
• Matches the regular expression called dotfoo. The portion that matched was dotcom.

• This report was delayed until the user edited.
• The string called dotfoo has a comment associated with it: Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. HBC NameWatcherBot (talk) 07:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

User-reported

• Yahoodotcom123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock) — Violation of username policy because it's a promotional username; Bullzeye ^{(Ring for Service)} 07:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• Wtf is your problem? (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock) — Violation of username policy because it's a offensive and disruptive username; » \ / (⁂ | ※) 07:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• Institute of Conflict Management (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock) — Violation of username policy because it's a misleading username; » \ / (⁂ | ※) 07:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• Bosnianhoe (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock) — Violation of username policy because it's a offensive username; I don't think hoe is referring to the gardening tool.. » \ / (⁂ | ※) 06:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• I NO ENGLSIH, MY DAUGTHER ENGLISHI (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · hardblock · softblock · spamblock) Perhaps not an appropriate username, given its length, connotation, and improper spelling.sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 23:40, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
  • According to the user page, he has a reason for choosing the name. DougsTech (talk) 05:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Within the 40 char limit, and good faith edits. --Unpopular Opinion (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• If he/she is allowed to keep the name, fine, but the spelling should at least be fixed. sixtynine ^{• spill it •}

Requests for permissions

Rollback (add request)

User:Shreevatsa

• Shreevatsa (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Usually I use the "Undo" button for blatant vandalism, but the rollback feature seems a bit more convenient (with nicer edit summaries). Shreevatsa (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Porchcrop

• Porchcrop (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

I want to revert vandalism quicker

Account creator (add request)

User:Jake Wartenberg

• Jake Wartenberg (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3) (assign permissions)

Need it for ACC Jake Wartenberg^talk 14:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

• • N Not done The account creator flag is not necessary to use the ACC tool. You have not created any accounts and thus we cannot judge whether you will properly use the rights given to you by the flag. Spend a few days creating accounts and if you are repeatedly coming up against the throttle, reapply. l'aquatique || talk 19:16, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I have done this now, I am hitting my limit. Can I be granted this permission? Thanks, Jake Wartenberg^Talk 22:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Y Done. Has now hit the limit and all the creations seem to be good. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 11:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)