User talk:Eleven even

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Eleven even, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ∴ Therefore | talk 23:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate Gift

I reversed your changes to The Ultimate Gift. Please review Wikipedia doesn't use spoiler alerts. Thanks! ∴ Therefore | talk 23:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] i reverted accidentally

Oooops, in case you see a revert of your contribution on caveman article, I reverted accidentally one of your reverts to a vandal. I edited out the vandal's text by hand --Enric Naval (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Greg Vanney worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ale_Jrb^talk 09:27, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rollback

You have been granted with rollback permission. Please only use it in a case of vandalism. For more information, you may refer to this page. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 13:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Executive

I was reverting vandalism, and that was part of the edits by the vandal. But an article about a coat in one episode of a sitcom doesn't seem a likely article. Corvus cornix_talk 17:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure there are rules, but I don't know where it might be... wait ... Wikipedia:Disambiguation, maybe? In general, there's no point in doing a disambig link to a page that doesn't address the term you're linking, if there's a mention of The Executive in a Seinfeld episode page, then linking there might be okay. Corvus cornix_talk 18:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Pediophobia

I have nominated Pediophobia, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pediophobia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ukexpat (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Udo Prambs

A tag has been placed on Udo Prambs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix_talk 05:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Udo Prambs

An editor has nominated Udo Prambs, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udo Prambs (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pediophobia

The article on fear of children was started in March 2007[1]. These two articles need to be combined, with the fear of dolls either taking its own article or being a subheading under the currently existing one. • Freechild'sup? 00:18, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah. After reviewing the deletion discussion[2] I would suggest this either be merged as I suggested, or leave fear of children to its own article and allow this article to solely cover the fear of dolls. • Freechild'sup? 00:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)